Check the quality you shipped
First-pass yield and the cost of rework
Why this step
How many units passed the site audit the first time, which failure modes recur, and what the rework cost. Broken down by profile series, this is the report that tells you a supplier or a design is the problem, not the crew.
What this does
Delivers in-depth analytics on site installation quality trends, evaluating First-Pass Yields (FPY), common failure categories (Sealant Void, Scratched Frame, Sash Sag), and rework labour costs.
Before you start
- Site QC inspections logged across active installation projects.
Steps















Important
Maintaining a First-Pass Yield (FPY) above 95% on site inspections ensures that installation crews meet handover targets without costly second-visit return trips.
-
01
Open Installation › Analysis & Reports.
-
02
Explore Site QC Results, Site QC Failures, and Site QC First Pass Rate.
-
03
Examine Site QC Measurements to evaluate laser tolerance deviations across window profiles.
-
04
Inspect Site QC Rework analytics to measure the financial cost of site technician rework hours.
Common mistakes
- Treating site rework hours as regular project hours without tagging them to the original defect root cause.
- Ignoring recurring sealant adhesion failures caused by low ambient temperatures.
Checkpoint
You can attribute site failures to a profile series or a failure mode rather than to a person.